In September, Brazil’s wealthiest and most populous state Sao Paulo went into contract with Chinese vaccine developer Sinovac Biotech, with the expectations to receive 46 million doses of CoronaVac. CoronaVac has been in Phase 3 testing in the South American country since July. On Friday, Sao Paulo Governor Joao Doria said if the COVID-19 vaccine is approved by the National Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), then mandatory vaccinations would follow, according to the Rio Times.
Doria told reporters Friday, Oct. 16, that: “In Sao Paulo, it will be mandatory, except for those with a medical note and a certificate stating that they cannot [take the vaccine].”
Just weeks ago, he told other reporters that Sao Paulo “will be one of the first places in the world to vaccinate the public.” He said his administration has already obtained 6 million CoronaVac doses for potential distribution.
Citing local media, RT News said Sao Paulo could have the CoronaVac vaccine approved as early as December. The trials are expected to be wrapped up this weekend, with results expected sometime early next week.
Doria has spent the last couple of months blasting President Jair Bolsonaro’s handling of the public health crisis – accusing him of “politicizing” the vaccine.
Bolsonaro recently responded to Doria’s comments, saying that the Health Ministry will not make vaccination mandatory. Bolsonaro also cited federal laws that determine it’s up to the federal government to decide if vaccinations are mandatory.
We exist to counter the massive disinformation campaign regarding the pandemic. We are diverse, exceedingly well-credentialed physicians with extensive front line experience treating COVID-19 and the risky health effects due to the lockdowns. There are many early treatment options! Most people do just fine!
There is no reason to live in fear!
If you would like to know the facts from doctors who are passionate about giving you those facts, watch our videos, found under Summit. If you need access to early treatment go to Referral.
If you simply want to understand what “early treatment” is, watch our “Early Treatment” video or look under HCQ Protocols.
Unlike the government, CDC, FDA, NIH or any other organization with other motives, we doctors have a fiduciary, moral, ethical, legal and spiritual obligation to help people … and that means you. We are not the media. Please share widely.
As our previous article How We Conquered Influenza After a Century of Failure discussed, nations are suddenly for the first time in history winning the war against Influenza. Today we’re covering Australia which has had the most remarkable success of anywhere on the planet.
Like all nations, Australia has waged war on the flu every year with some years having several hundred thousand cases.
2019 was an especially large flu season for Australia, with more than 217,000 cases occurring between April 2019 and September 2019. For the same period in 2020, Australia has had just 1133 cases, a stunning reduction of 99.6%
Compared to 2018 an unusually tame flu season, they’re still down more than 96%. With more than 10,000 cases a week during 2019, we are certain that Australian’s must have been terrified and begging the Government to save them. We are trying to locate news footage of the lock downs, mask mandates and social distancing guidelines that they employed during the 2019 pandemic but so far have been unsuccessful in locating that footage.
Some people have noted that this reduction in influenza is proof positive that our counter-measures such as lock downs and mask mandates are working. Australia has never had by any definition a “pandemic” of COVID-19, with a total of only 27,000 cases since the “pandemic” began. In other Nations like the United States which our previous article illustrated, while influenza has completely collapsed and essentially disappeared – COVID cases have exploded.
Which begs the question: How can lock downs, mask mandates, and social distancing all but eliminate one airborne infectious virus – and yet do virtually nothing to stop a different airborne infectious virus?
When the pandemic started the Government and media quickly proclaimed that we were all going to die if we did not submit to whatever they suggested. It began with two weeks to flatten the curve. Then two months. Then six months. Then it’s just a mask. Then it’s just a vaccine.
Bill Gates has been the loudest proponent for destroying the livelihood of the middle-class through arbitrary, widespread lock downs but also the biggest proponent of pushing mass vaccinations on all seven billion people on Earth.
Back in April, as this interview with PBS discusses, Gates said that we will not be able to return to ‘normal’ until we both have a vaccine and virtually everyone on the planet has received it. A rushed, untested, unproven vaccine that apparently requires multiple doses is bad enough. But Gates has now doubled-down stating that we will not return to normal until everyone also takes the second generation of super vaccinations in addition. With the first vaccines not even available as we write, it begs the question – how many years will it take before everyone has received this second generation vaccine? Until then, we should continue to destroy our nations?
“The only way we’ll get completely back to normal is by having, maybe not the first generation of vaccines, but eventually a vaccine that is super-effective, and that a lot of the people take, and that we get the disease eliminated on a global basis,” said Gates.
“That is where we can finally start taking all the problems that have been created — in education, mental health — and start to build back in a positive way,” he added.
It’s important to remember that vaccine manufacturers are exempt from all liability of damages caused by their vaccines, including death. And this is not specific to potential COVID-19 vaccines but in fact all vaccines currently mandated.
As of October 13th, 9,227 medical and health scientists as well as 23,943 medical practioners have signed the Great Barrington Declaration. The declaration has been censored across social media as Governments and their tech allies have sought to conceal the fact that there is no global concensus that lockdowns work, or that they should be used at all. As the declaration began to gain steam the World Health Organisation appears to have walked back their stance on lock downs.
The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.